· 11/17/1969
Newmark v. Gimbel's Incorporated
Citations
- 258 A.2d 697
- 54 N.J. 585
- 6 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1205
- 1969 N.J. LEXIS 232
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- characterizing sale and application of permanent wave solution by a beauty shop operator as a hybrid transaction and holding beauty shop strictly liable for customer’s injuries that resulted
- patron of beauty salon injured by solution applied while receiving permanent wave
- injury to patron’s hair resulting from product used to apply a permanent wave
- strict liability for application of defective wave permanent by beauty parlor
- permanent wave solution used at beauty parlor
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Francis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.