Skip to main content
· 11/17/1969

Newmark v. Gimbel's Incorporated

Citations

  • 258 A.2d 697
  • 54 N.J. 585
  • 6 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1205
  • 1969 N.J. LEXIS 232

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • characterizing sale and application of permanent wave solution by a beauty shop operator as a hybrid transaction and holding beauty shop strictly liable for customer’s injuries that resulted
  • patron of beauty salon injured by solution applied while receiving permanent wave
  • injury to patron’s hair resulting from product used to apply a permanent wave
  • strict liability for application of defective wave permanent by beauty parlor
  • permanent wave solution used at beauty parlor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Francis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.