Skip to main content
· 12/12/1988

Newman v. Reilly

Citations

  • 550 A.2d 959
  • 314 Md. 364
  • 1988 Md. LEXIS 163

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that timeliness of filing of notice of appeal is a jurisdictional issue
  • explaining that Mr. Reilly had substantial justification for his cause of action based upon his interpretation of an ambiguous statute
  • granting of sanctions in the absence of a hearing was proper where the movant’s request for a hearing was untimely
  • “Rule 1-341 is not intended to penalize a party and/or counsel for asserting a colorable claim or defense.”
  • \Rule 1-341 is not intended to penalize a party and/or counsel for asserting a colorable claim or defense.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Eldridge, Cole, Rodowsky, McAuliffe, Adkins, Blackwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.