Newman v. Peay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the Service has some discre- tion to choose the “period of foreseeability” “so long as [its] decision [is] justifiable and clearly articulated”
• noting that the Service “determines what constitutes the 26 ‘foreseeable’ future on a case-by-case basis in each listing decision”
• “Wyoming intends to meet its statutory and regulatory standards by managing for' a buffer above the minimum management targets”
• “Wyoming’s wolf population will be further buffered because WGFD intends to maintain an adequate buffer above minimum population objections”
• “Wyoming also intends to manage well above these minimum required lev els”
• “FWS determines what constitutes the ‘foreseeable’ future on a case-by-case basis in each listing decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).