Newman v. Newman
Citations
- 69 Ill. 167
Syllabus
<p>1. Divorce—alimony and solicitor's fees pendente lite. During the penclenoy of a suit for divorce, the court may rightfully allow the wife alimony pendente lite on a proper showing, where she has no means, and also a reasonable sum for her solicitor’s fees, and money to enable her to develop her cause of action and bring it to a speedy trial.</p> <p>2. Same—solicitor's fees after the suit is terminated adversely to wife. After the final hearing of a suit for divorce brought by the wife, upon her bill and cross-bill of the husband, in which the wife is defeated, and her bill dismissed, and a divorce granted to the husband, it is error for the court to require the husband to pay the wife’s solicitor’s fees.</p>
Judges: Craig
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Harding v. HardingIllinois Supreme Court· 1892-10-31· cited 56×
- Trudgen v. TrudgenMontana Supreme Court· 1958-07-30· cited 20×
- Wagner v. WagnerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1886-01-21· cited 11×
- Dawson v. DawsonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1889-05-28· cited 10×
- Arndt v. ArndtAppellate Court of Illinois· 1947-04-21· cited 10×
- Long v. LongMissouri Court of Appeals· 1899-01-02· cited 7×
- Druce v. DruceAppellate Court of Illinois· 1942-01-14· cited 5×
- Farrell v. FarrellAppellate Court of Illinois· 1909-03-24· cited 2×
- People ex rel. Mehan v. MehanAppellate Court of Illinois· 1916-03-15· cited 2×
- Mayer v. MayerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1943-11-17· cited 2×
- Stein v. BlakeAppellate Court of Illinois· 1894-12-13
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.