Skip to main content
· 6/18/2013

Newman v. McKay

Citations

  • 58 V.I. 170
  • 2013 V.I. LEXIS 44

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, because the plaintiff’s injury was “intertwined” with that of the defendant fund, the action was derivative under Delaware law
  • “Elendow fails to plead sufficient red flags to show that the inference that Tremont must have been aware of the fraud is at least as compelling as any opposing inference of nonfraudulent intent.”
  • “Elendow fails to plead sufficient red flags to show that the inference that Tremont must have been aware of the fraud is at least as compelling as any opposing inference of nonfraudulent intent.”
  • addressing scienter under the federal securities laws
  • addressing scienter under the federal securities laws

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carroll

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.