Newland v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that any rational trier of fact could have determined that the use of a weapon after the theft occurred during the robbery because there were no “intervening circumstances”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Garcia v. Dretke
  Fifth Circuit· 2004-10-18· cited 24×
• Olin Jeffries Nelson v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1996-08-28
• Daniel Blanco v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1997-03-20

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Geesa v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-11-06· cited 2,157×
• Villalon v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-06-06· cited 542×
• Sterling v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-12-19· cited 231×
• Blain v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-03-23· cited 213×
• Denham v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-12-13· cited 182×
• Tisdale v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-03-13· cited 167×
• Bilbrey v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-01-23· cited 72×
• White v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-04-25· cited 71×
• Vaughn v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-06-16· cited 53×
• Oggletree v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1993-03-18· cited 36×
• Candelaria v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1989-11-22· cited 16×
• Chandler v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1993-04-14· cited 13×
• Bonner v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1992-03-18· cited 10×
• Horn v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1993-05-13· cited 1×