Newland v. Newland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding husband did establish that funds in account were his separate property because for most of the twenty-year period involved, the husband’s “testimony was corroborated by bank records” and “documentary evidence”
• holding husband did establish that funds in account were his separate property because for most of the twenty-year period involved, the husband’s “testimony was corroborated by bank records” and “documentary evidence”
• holding husband did establish that funds in account were his separate property because for most of the twenty-year period involved, the husband’s “testimony was corroborated by bank records” and “documentary evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).