Newell v. Whigham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a jury cannot presume a guilty knowledge based upon “recency plus lack of explanation,” but a jury could infer guilt under such circumstances
• \an inference is no more that a logical tool enabling the trier of fact to proceed from one fact to another.\
• \[w]e have long recognized a distinction between the warrantless search of an automobile and that of a home or office\
• “[w]e have long recognized a distinction between the warrantless search of an automobile and that of a home or office”
• retrial barred after court declared mistrial sua sponte because jurors overheard assistant district attorney say, \Is the man with the records here?\
• “A rebuttable presumption forces the defendant to come forth or suffer inevitable defeat on the issue in controversy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).