District Court of Appeal of Florida· 8/4/2006
Newell v. State
Citations
- 935 So. 2d 83
- 2006 WL 2190958
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that convictions for two counts of sexual battery did not violate double jeopardy; conversation between defendant and victim constituted a sufficient temporal break between the acts to allow for reflection
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WhiteLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1988-09-21· cited 32×
- Capron v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-02-16· cited 27×
- Meshell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-04-11· cited 6×
- J.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-02-20· cited 4×
- JM v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-02-20· cited 1×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. PaulSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-06-22· cited 78×
- State v. FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-02-17· cited 54×
- Cabrera v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-08· cited 22×
- Gutierrez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-12-05· cited 8×
- May v. SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENTSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-06-20· cited 3×
- Bradley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-22· cited 2×
- Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-05· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.