Newcomb v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting difficulty inherent in considering speedy trial complaint on incomplete record because Barker test by its nature “requires a full development of the facts”
• noting nature of Barker test requires full development of facts
• “If we were to consider this issue [of violation of a defendant’s right to a speedy trial], which by nature of the applicable balancing test requires a full development of the facts, on our own motion, it would be necessary to abate the case for a full hearing on the matter.”
• “If we were to consider this issue [of violation of a defendant’s right to a speedy trial], which by nature of the applicable balancing test requires a full development 13 of the facts, on our own motion, it would be necessary to abate the case for a full hearing on the matter.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wade v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2002-07-11· cited 54×
• Hernandez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-10-05· cited 48×
• Champion v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-12-05· cited 34×
• Frabon Crocker v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2013-01-24· cited 21×
• Grimaldo v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2004-03-11· cited 17×
• State v. Reyes
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2005-02-02· cited 6×
• John L. Newman v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2009-10-08· cited 3×
• State v. Jose Reyes
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2005-02-02
• Frank William Wade v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2002-07-11
• Enrique Grimaldo v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2004-03-11
• Leandre v. Hill v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2015-11-04
• Luis Terraza Duran v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2016-05-31
• the State of Texas v. Michael David Segura
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2022-07-20
• Lance Taylor v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2022-10-06
• Ex Parte Jorge Favian Dominguez Ortiz
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2023-02-01
• TAYLOR, LANCE v. the State of Texas
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2023-05-17

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Barker v. Wingo
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
• Klopfer v. North Carolina
  Supreme Court· 1967-03-13· cited 1,817×
• Smith v. Hooey
  Supreme Court· 1969-01-20· cited 1,132×
• Dickey v. Florida
  Supreme Court· 1970-05-25· cited 824×
• Moore v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1973-11-05· cited 594×
• McCarty v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-07-11· cited 107×
• Ross v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-06-04· cited 87×
• Pete v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-11-28· cited 79×
• Farr v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-03-12· cited 79×
• McKinney v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-02-07· cited 71×
• Haas v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-07-17· cited 64×
• Ex Parte Trillo
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-09-15· cited 54×
• Sherman v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-02-18· cited 42×
• Davison v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-06-12· cited 41×
• George v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-07-11· cited 22×
• McClure v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-07-11· cited 20×
• Hilts v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-02-23· cited 19×