Newcomb v. Ingle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “[t]here is no persuasive reason why Congress would exempt a business extension and not one in the home. The difference between listening on the extension and tapping the line within a home in the context here is not material.”
• holding \[t]here is no persuasive reason why Congress would exempt a business extension and not one in the home. The difference between listening on the extension and tapping the line within a home in the context here is not material.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• PBA Local No. 38 v. Woodbridge Police Department
  D. New Jersey· 1993-09-09· cited 60×
• State v. Capell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-10-28· cited 6×