Skip to main content
· 1/16/1998

Newco Drilling Co. v. Weyand

Citations

  • 960 S.W.2d 654
  • 41 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 265
  • 1998 Tex. LEXIS 2
  • 1998 WL 12327

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that court of appeals erred by failing to review merits of partial summary judgment after plaintiffs allowed their case to be dismissed for want of prosecution
  • holding that court of appeals erred by failing to review merits of partial summary judgment after plaintiffs allowed their case to be dismissed for want of prosecution
  • holding that court of appeals erred by failing to review merits of partial summary judgment after plaintiffs allowed their case to be dismissed for want of prosecution
  • reiterating that “a party against whom ... an interlocutory summary judgment has been rendered will have his right of appeal when ... the same is merged in a final judgment disposing of the whole case”
  • holding court of appeals erred in failing to review the merits of the trial court’s grant of a partial summary judgment after the plaintiffs allowed their case to be dismissed for want of prosecution
  • holding court of appeals erred in failing to review the merits of the trial court’s grant of a partial summary judgment after the plaintiffs allowed their case to be dismissed for want of prosecution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.