Newby v. Obama

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing “bizarre conspiracy 25 theory” related to “alleged government surveillance and harassment,” based on substantiality doctrine
• dismissing pro se complaint alleging conspiracies about “government surveillance and harassment” as patently insubstantial under Rule 12(b)(1)
• explaining “claims relating to alleged government surveillance and harassment are the sort of ‘bizarre conspiracy theory’ that warrant dismissal” and dismissing the complaint as frivolous
• noting that “even a pro se plaintiff bears the burden”
• explaining “claims relating to alleged government surveillance and harassment are the sort of ‘bizarre conspiracy theory’ that warrant dismissal” and dismissing the complaint as frivolous
• dismissing FISA and First Amendment claims arising from a government conspiracy theory as patently insubstantial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).