Skip to main content

Newburgh Hts. v. State

Citations

  • 166 N.E.3d 632
  • 2021 Ohio 61

Syllabus

H.B. 62 traffic cameras preliminary injunction irreparable harm likelihood of success on the merits public interest constitutionality of a statute home rule amendment. The trial court's judgment denying the cities' motions for preliminary injunction was affirmed with respect to the provision of H.B. 62 that stated municipal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over challenges to citations from a traffic camera. However, the trial court's judgment denying the cities' motions for preliminary injunction was reversed with respect to two provisions of H.B. 62 that (1) reduced the cities' local government funds and (2) required the cities to pay advance court deposits because these two provisions violate the Home Rule Amendment.

Judges: Boyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.