Newborn v. Hood

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘Tacts, when finally known, present an unconscionable result because of the equitable principle of doing justice under the circumstances”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bennett v. Shinoda Floral, Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1987-07-02· cited 27×
• Kelly v. Widner
  Montana Supreme Court· 1989-04-06· cited 19×
• Maglin v. Tschannerl
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2002-05-24· cited 17×
• Simmons v. Blauw
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-05-06· cited 14×
• Gutierrez v. Schultz
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1982-09-24· cited 10×
• Iloh v. Stein
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-03-20· cited 3×
• Antal v. Taylor
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-05-21· cited 2×
• Vaessen v. Weber
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-02-26
• Wieneke v. Weitekamp
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-05-27

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Meyer v. Murray
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-03-07· cited 54×
• Ruggles v. Selby
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1960-04-14· cited 41×
• Reede v. Treat
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1965-08-24· cited 21×
• Kiest v. Schrawder
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-01-27· cited 13×
• Scherer v. Ravenswood Hospital Medical Center
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-04-10· cited 10×
• Willis v. Reum
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-09-19· cited 9×