Newborn v. Clay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• divorce decree failed to describe and dispose of property and, thus, did not affect title
• “agreement is not ambiguous simply because it fails to dispose of or make reference to the disposition of property in which both parties have an interest”
• “parties to a divorce decree must specifically describe and dispose of property in which both parties have an interest or the decree will not divest either party of their interest in the property”
• \parties to a divorce decree must specifically describe and dispose of property in which both parties have an interest or the decree will not divest either party of their interest in the property\
• explaining a default rule for real property in divorce proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).