Newbold v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a plaintiff who received notice of toll violations failed to assert a due process claim
• addressing, at the merits stage, the argument “the hearing to which [plaintiff] was entitled, but did not request, would not have provided him with a meaningful opportunity to be heard.”
• addressing, at the merits stage, the argument “the hearing to which [plaintiff] was entitled, but did not request, would not have provided him with a meaningful opportunity to be -6- heard.”
• addressing, at the merits stage, the 11 argument “the hearing to which [plaintiff] was entitled, but did not request, would not have 12 provided him with a meaningful opportunity to be heard.”
• statute or regulation is adequate notice in and of itself as long as it is clear
• “The Equal protection Clause generally protects people who are treated differently because of membership in a suspect class or who have been denied a fundamental right.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).