Newbold v. Peat Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 1 addressing case captioning is only a claim processing rule, not a jurisdictional rule
• holding that Rule 1 addressing case captioning is only a claim processing rule, not a jurisdictional rule
• parsing which parts of a request for review are “essential” such that they carry jurisdictional weight and concluding that failure to include the proper respondent in the caption is not always a jurisdictional defect
• “The PERB has jurisdiction to hear complaints alleging that a recognized union failed to comply with the specified conduct standards.”
• ―For purposes of this appeal, we need not decide whether our decisions labeling the time limit jurisdictional remain good law in light of subsequent Supreme Court cases (including those cited in the next paragraph

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).