Skip to main content
· 7/1/1874

Newbit v. Inhabitants of Appleton

Citations

  • 63 Me. 491

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing prior case where parent company had authority to compel safety procedures but did not exercise it versus case where parent company mandated specific safety policies
  • distinguishing prior case where parent company had authority to compel safety procedures but did not exercise it versus case where parent company mandated specific safety policies
  • involving an injury cased by a steel plate dislodging from a crane
  • “We have explained that there can be no estoppel from acceptance of the benefits by a person who did not have knowledge of all material facts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Appleton, Barrows, Cutting, Danforts, Peters, Walton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.