· 7/1/1874
Newbit v. Inhabitants of Appleton
Citations
- 63 Me. 491
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- distinguishing prior case where parent company had authority to compel safety procedures but did not exercise it versus case where parent company mandated specific safety policies
- distinguishing prior case where parent company had authority to compel safety procedures but did not exercise it versus case where parent company mandated specific safety policies
- involving an injury cased by a steel plate dislodging from a crane
- “We have explained that there can be no estoppel from acceptance of the benefits by a person who did not have knowledge of all material facts”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Appleton, Barrows, Cutting, Danforts, Peters, Walton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.