New York v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that NRC took sufficient account of risk from terrorism “when deciding that the risk of fire at a spent fuel pool was uniformly low” (emphasis added)
• concluding that NRC took sufficient .account of risk from terrorism “when deciding that the risk of fire at a spent fuel pool was uniformly low” (emphasis added)
• “To deny review of a rulemaking petition, a court typically need do no more than assure itself that an agency’s decision was ‘reasoned,’ meaning that it considered the relevant factors.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).