Supreme Court· 4/15/1985
New York v. Smith
Citations
- 471 U.S. 1049
- 105 S. Ct. 2043
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- in an action for fraud, patent licensee’s claim that licensor failed to disclose “material” information does not constitute either misrepresentation or fraud, as there was no duty to disclose the information during arms’ length negotiation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Consideration, Petitions, Took
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hecht v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-01-11· cited 149×
- Newell v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-09-10· cited 109×
- Walter G. Finch v. Hughes Aircraft CompanyFederal Circuit· 1991-02-27· cited 104×
- Crosten v. KamaufD. Maryland· 1996-03-25· cited 90×
- Comptroller of Treasury v. World Book Childcraft International, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1986-05-09· cited 44×
- Fairfax Savings, F.S.B. v. Weinberg & GreenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-12-06· cited 16×
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. VolandCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-02-06· cited 12×
- Newell v. RichardsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1990-08-08· cited 7×
- Tiller Construction Corp. v. NadlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-03-07· cited 3×
- J.C. Snavely & Sons, Inc. v. WheelerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1988-03-04· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.