New York v. Salazar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the results of a FOIA request are “specific to the actual requests made” and are not the same as an administrative record
• finding that “produced evidence” of a conflict of interest sufficiently supported extra-record discovery into bad faith conduct
• observing that “[u]nder the statute, ... a party is deemed to have constructively exhausted all administrative remedies if the agency fails to make a determination with respect to any appeal within twenty days... after receipt of any such request”
• finding Privilege inapplicable where “several of [the plaintiffs’] claims squarely challenge[d] the process by which the [agency] made its decision”
• “A party seeking review of an agency’s response to a FOIA request is entitled to commence a civil action toward that end. Such actions are generally determined on motion for summary judgment.” (footnote omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).