Skip to main content
· 12/22/1999

New York v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York

Citations

  • 78 F. Supp. 2d 49
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20030
  • 1999 WL 1269320

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “the State has not invoked the authority of the NIGC to resolve this dispute; thus, there exists no danger of inconsistent rulings if the case is decided by the Court because the issue presented involves the interpretation of a particular Compact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McAVOY

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.