· 1/12/1983
New York v. Gorsuch
Citations
- 554 F. Supp. 1060
- 18 ERC 1575
- 13 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20248
- 18 ERC (BNA) 1575
- 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20110
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “To ignore or modify the statutory timetable would be to flout the considered judgment of Congress”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Conner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.