New York v. Cedeno

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Our recent decision in Energy Capital Corp. v. United States establishes that a loss of profits claim that flows directly from the contract is not necessarily a form of consequential or incidental damages. 302 F.3d 1314 (Fed. Cir. 2002
• “Our recent decision in Energy Capital Corp. v. United States establishes that a loss of profits claim that flows directly from the contract is not necessarily a form of consequential or incidental damages. 302 F.3d 1314 (Fed. Cir. 2002

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).