Skip to main content
· 4/19/1993

New York Underwriters Insurance Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Citations

  • 856 S.W.2d 194
  • 1993 Tex. App. LEXIS 1914
  • 1993 WL 124782

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding, “summary judgment is inappropriate for deciding the motives and credibility of the person signing the alleged groundless petition” and concluding trial court erred in granting Hartford’s motion for summary judgment on State Farm’s counterclaim for relief under Rule 13
  • “Under these circumstances, the carrier may recover the settlement proceeds from the injured worker.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Ovard, Rosenberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.