Skip to main content
· 6/28/2007

New York Times Co. v. United States Department of Defense

Citations

  • 499 F. Supp. 2d 501
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47904
  • 2007 WL 1946574

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding comments sent from a White House Counsel’s Office attorney regarding the President’s radio address protected from disclosure by Exemption 5
  • “Following a review of Defendants’ additional submissions, the Court will determine whether summary judgment is appropriate with respect to the Unclassified Documents and the adequacy of the DOD search.”
  • “the mere fact that a document is a draft ... is not a sufficient reason to automatically exempt it from disclosure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.