Skip to main content
· 8/13/1982

New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund v. Hoh

Citations

  • 554 F. Supp. 519
  • 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17285

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding defendant’s argument that the court’s “judgment” herein must necessarily include medical expenses obtained by a non-party requires an unnecessarily restrictive application of G.S. § 6-21.1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.