New York State Teamsters Conference Pension And Retirement Fund v. Boening Brothers, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that proposed audit was proper exercise of fund’s common law powers but also instructing district courts that “it may be appropriate for [defendant employers] to seek protection from an audit that is unduly broad or intrusive in its scope”
• “As is apparent from the statutory text, an award of attorney fees and costs is . . . mandatory under subsection (2), of section 1132(g).”
• “As is apparent from the statutory text, an award of attorney fees and costs is . . . mandatory under subsection (2), of section 1132(g).”
• audits of signatory Company fall “well within the scope of a trustee's common law fiduciary duties and powers.”
• “As is apparent from the statutory text, an award of attorney fees and costs is discretionary under subsection (1), and mandatory under subsection (2), of section 1132(g).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).