Skip to main content
· 7/3/1996

New York State Electric & Gas Corporation v. Secretary of Labor and Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

Citations

  • 88 F.3d 98
  • 1996 CCH OSHD 31,099
  • 35 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 454
  • 17 OSHC (BNA) 1650
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 15851

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Secretary “must first make out a prima facie case before the affirmative defense comes into play”
  • holding that unforeseeability and unpreventibility are affirmative defenses and citing authority from the First, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Eleventh Circuits in support of this proposition
  • knowledge may be satisfied by proof that employer, with the exercise of reasonable diligence, could have known of the presence of the violative condition
  • “We note that under the Commission’s precedent, ... the Secretary’s prima facie case and the employer’s unpreventable conduct defense both involve an identical issue: whether the employer had an adequate safety policy.”
  • “[A] party cannot normally show that it suffered prejudice simply because of a change in its opponent’s legal theory. Instead, a party’s failure to plead an issue it later presented must have disadvantaged its opponent in presenting its case.”
  • discussing Pennsylvania Power & Light and Mountain States

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Feinberg, Cardamone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.