New York State Electric & Gas Corp. v. Meredith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[p]resentation of a claim under the same general legal umbrella but with entirely different factual underpinnings . . . does not constitute fair presentation” of the claim (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• “A state court’s findings on subsidiary factual questions are entitled to § 2254(e)(1)’s presumption of correctness. This is true even when the factual findings are merely implicit.”
• employing a three-part analysis to an actual innocence gateway claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).