Skip to main content
· 9/16/1968

New York State Commission for Human Rights v. E. Landau Industries, Inc.

Citations

  • 57 Misc. 2d 918
  • 293 N.Y.S.2d 917
  • 1968 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1200

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the ALJ must consider all the evidence, including a claimant’s own description of limitations
  • rejecting plaintiff’s argument that ALJ should have given more weight to opinion where ALJ “provided legitimate reasons for discounting”
  • “Despite [plaintiff’s] dissatisfaction with how the ALJ weighed the evidence, it is not this Court’s role to reweigh that evidence.”
  • “Despite [the claimant’s] dissatisfaction with how the ALJ weighed the evidence, it is not this Court’s role to reweigh that evidence.”
  • “Despite [the claimant’s] dissatisfaction with how the ALJ weighed the evidence, it is not this Court’s role to reweigh that evidence.”
  • RFC determination is based on all relevant evidence, including the medical records, observations of treating physicians and others, and claimant’s subjective complaints

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCullough

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.