Skip to main content
· 6/29/2004

New York SMSA v. Bd. of Adj.

Citations

  • 851 A.2d 110
  • 370 N.J. Super. 319

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding to a board of adjustment to make factual findings because of \the legal insufficiency of the resolution\
  • finding the particular suitability of a wireless communication facility site was established by expert testimony and evidence that the site would redress cellular coverage issues, and \that no technically comparable alternate sites are available\
  • \[R]emarks [made by an individual Board member] at best reflect the beliefs of the speaker and cannot be assumed to represent the findings of an entire Board.\
  • \[R]emarks [made by an individual board member] at best reflect A-0972-22 19 the beliefs of the speaker and cannot be assumed to represent the findings of an entire Board.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges King, Lintner and Lisa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.