New York Progress & Protection PAC v. Walsh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[o]nce it is determined that [plaintiff] is an independent expenditure-only organization, there is little left for the [c]ourt to do.... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Seaton v. Wiener
  D. Minnesota· 2014-05-19· cited 8×
• Fund for Louisiana's Future v. Louisiana Board of Ethics
  E.D. Louisiana· 2014-05-02· cited 2×
• Hispanic Leadership Fund, Inc. v. Walsh
  N.D. New York· 2014-08-28

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
  Supreme Court· 2010-01-21· cited 1,732×
• Hutto v. Davis
  Supreme Court· 1982-03-22· cited 815×
• New York Progress and Protection PAC v. Walsh
  Second Circuit· 2013-10-24· cited 117×
• Speechnow.org v. Federal Election Commission
  D.C. Circuit· 2010-03-29· cited 108×
• Republican Party of New Mexico v. King
  Tenth Circuit· 2013-12-18· cited 45×