Skip to main content
· 5/24/1909

New York & Porto Rico Steamship Co. v. Bull

Citations

  • 214 U.S. 526
  • 29 S. Ct. 704
  • 53 L. Ed. 1068
  • 1909 U.S. LEXIS 2030

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A statute which provides for a thing to be done in a particular manner . . . implies that it shall not be done otherwise[.]”
  • violation of proclamation declaring the existence of a fuel emergency
  • “A statute which provides for a thing to be done in a particular manner . . . implies that it shall not be done otherwise . . .; and the maxim expressio unius est exclusio alterius, the express mention of one thing implies the exclusion of another, applies to such statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.