New York, Ontario & Western Railroad v. Oles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that bankruptcy court had core jurisdiction over creditor’s proof of claim regarding a pre-petition contract where the claim arose under state law
• holding that proceedings that affect the allowance of a claim are core
• holding that proceedings that affect the allowance of a claim are core
• “Nothing is more directly at the core of bankruptcy administration ... than the quantification of all liabilities of the debtor.”
• “Nothing is more directly at the core of bankruptcy administration ... than the quantification of all liabilities of the debtor.”
• “[B]oth the Supreme Court and this court have concluded that the Marathon holding was a narrow one and have broadly construed the jurisdictional grant in the 1984 Bankruptcy Amendments.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).