New York Hotel and Motel Trades Council v. Hotel St. George

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a party may not oppose confirmation of an arbitration award on res judicata grounds where that argument was not presented”
• noting that the latter award “is the product of a complaint against [the Hotel] that is separate and distinct from the one that resulted in the [prior] Award,” and that charges “different violations of the Agreement”
• declining to treat the validity of a 1997 award following an unconfirmed 1993 award as a statute of limitations question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).