Skip to main content
· 3/21/2001

New York Ex Rel. Vacco v. RAC Holding, Inc.

Citations

  • 135 F. Supp. 2d 359
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3659
  • 2001 WL 309957

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • collecting cases in the Second Circuit reducing requested fee awards by ten to twenty percent for vague or incomplete billing records
  • listing cases in which courts in the Second Circuit have repeatedly reduced fee requests by 10% to 20%
  • reducing a fee award based on impermissibly vague time entries that “indicate[d] merely that a phone call was made or a meeting attended without describing the nature of the discussions therein”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kahn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.