New York Cross Harbor Railroad v. Surface Transportation Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an “agency acts arbitrarily and capriciously if it reverses its position in the face of a precedent it has not persuasively distinguished”
• faulting Board for failing to distinguish case from “uniform” precedent and providing no reasoned explanation of why it ignored “factors and reasoning it has previously — and consistently — found controlling”
• vacating and remanding an agency decision although the decision had terminated agency jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).