New York Credit Men's Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Heiblum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the argument that “current or preceding calendar year” means “the prior calendar year and only those months of the current year preceding the incident at issue” as incompatible with the plain language of Title VII
• rejecting the argument that \current or preceding calendar year\ means \the prior calendar year and only those months of the current year preceding the incident at issue\ as incompatible with the plain language of Title VII
• “[T]he award of back pay is an integral part of the equitable remedy of reinstatement . . . .”
• Title VII “give[s] no evidence” of an intent to measure the “relevant number of employees over the 24 months preceding the incident.”
• identity of interest between successive employers
• case also went to trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).