New York City Triathlon, LLC v. Nyc Triathlon Club, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff was likely to succeed on merits of § 349 claim premised on likelihood of confusion between marks
• stating that the “mere fact that a defendant was aware of a plaintiff’s mark is not necessarily inconsistent with a defendant’s good faith”
• “Defendant has not demonstrated it will likely suffer any harm absent the posting of a bond, and the likelihood of success on the merits is overwhelming.”
• “[T]he public has an interest in not being deceived—in being assured that the mark it associates with a product is not attached to goods of unknown origin and quality.”
• consumers have an “interest in not being deceived—in being assured that the mark [they] associate [] with a product is not attached to goods of unknown origin and quality”
• “[T]he public has an interest in not being deceived—in being assured that the mark it associates with a product is not attached to goods of unknown origin and quality.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).