New York Central Railroad v. Palella

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing the “intemperate argument of counsel” and, in the course of doing so, stating that “[c]urse words have no place in the courtroom”
• “The ruling of the District Judge in limiting Mrs. Pingatore’s deposition to impeachment purposes was erroneous. . . . The error was harmless because the material matters developed in the deposition were covered by other evidence in the record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).