New York Cent. R. v. City of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the state’s argument that circumstantial evidence that the defendant stole a stereo justified an award of restitution; because the defendant did not admit to stealing the stereo, restitution for the stereo could not be imposed
• defendant’s theft of cash and tires from a car, the crimes for which he was convicted, did not make possible the theft of the car’s stereo—a crime he had not admitted and with which he was not charged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).