New York Carpet World, Inc. v. Department of Employment Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the party which made the final administrative decision from which plaintiff was appealing had to be individually named and served, even if the governmental entity of which it was an arm was named and served
• \the specific requirement that an administrative-review summons issue against required defendants within 35 days controls over the more general Code section 2-616(d) permitting the addition of defendants\
• “the specific requirement that an administrative-review summons issue against required defendants within 35 days controls over the more general Code section 2 — 616(d) permitting the addition of defendants”
• “[e]ven if Lockett did not decide by implication the availability of section 2 — 616(d), we find that the specific requirement that an administrative-review summons issue against required defendants within 35 days controls over the more general Code section 2 — 616(d

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).