Skip to main content
· 7/10/1905

New York & C. Mail S. S. Co. v. Ansonia Clock Co.

Citations

  • 139 F. 894
  • 1905 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding defendants’ admissions of failure to pay overtime rates, along with plaintiffs’ evidence that overtime was not paid, satisfied commonality requirement
  • certifying a class where plaintiffs rejected a Rule 68 offer of judgment in a class action, negating inference of conflict of interest
  • finding commonality satisfied where “the class members’ claims all derive from the same compensation policies” (citing Shahriar v. Smith & Wollensky Rest. Grp., Inc., 659 F.3d 234, 252 (2d Cir. 2011))
  • “It is well- established that the court may, in its discretion . . . modify the definition of the proposed class to provide the necessary precision or to correct other deficiencies.” (alterations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.