Skip to main content
· 2/8/1926

New York, B. & M. B. R. Co. v. Commissioner

Citations

  • 3 B.T.A. 606
  • 1926 BTA LEXIS 2613

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that evidence of the defendant’s prior domestic violence against the witness didn’t satisfy the fourth prong of Wash. R. Evid. 404(b
  • finding that erroneous admission of prior acts of domestic violence was reversible error
  • recognizing the risk of unfair prejudice is very high in domestic violence cases
  • stating defendant must show that an error under 404(b) had a reasonable probability of affecting the outcome of their trial
  • stating without qualification that trial court must give limiting instruction if ER 404(b) evidence admitted
  • finding trial court erred in allowing prior acts of domestic violence where probative value of the evidence was substantially outweighed by its prejudicial effect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marquette, Green, Love, Moréis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.