New v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that an objection of improper foundation was \sufficiently specific to preserve the authentication issue\ under Oklahoma law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pennington v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-12-28· cited 59×
• Shultz v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1991-05-08· cited 45×
• Black v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1994-02-01· cited 34×
• State v. Long
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2002-06-21· cited 31×
• Brewer v. City of Tulsa
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1991-05-14· cited 7×
• THE B&F CORPORATION v. CAVERS
  Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 2022-09-23

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Spuehler v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1985-12-02· cited 534×
• United States v. Alexander Sutton
  D.C. Circuit· 1969-11-07· cited 58×
• Lee v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1985-06-05· cited 37×
• Fitchen v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1987-06-03· cited 31×
• Hightower v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1983-11-22· cited 27×
• Patterson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1987-03-27· cited 21×
• Mornes v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1988-04-13· cited 18×
• Owens v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1988-01-12· cited 8×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1986-06-05· cited 8×
• Ingram v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1988-05-18· cited 2×