Skip to main content
· 12/2/2010

New v. Personal Representative of the Estate of New

Citations

  • 938 N.E.2d 758
  • 2010 Ind. App. LEXIS 2248
  • 2010 WL 4899621

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that it is not incumbent upon this Court to “search the record for support” of a party’s arguments or “consider issues” left unarticulated
  • statement of facts section of appellant’s brief shall neither omit relevant facts nor contain subjective argument
  • statement of facts section of appellant’s brief shall neither omit relevant facts nor contain subjective argument
  • “We will not conduct research to remedy deficiencies in the presentation of the case before this court.”
  • failure to cite to the record or cases and statutes germane to the issue results in waiver of the issue
  • appellant’s statement of facts shall neither omit relevant facts nor contain subjective argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bailey, Riley, Kirsch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.