New v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[t]he refusal to obey an order to return to work, once the changes had been made in the work site, without further evidence that these changes would not satisfy the . . . needs of [the employee], does 8 not establish good cause for the refusal to return to work”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Philadelphia Gas Works v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-01-13· cited 16×
• Knarr v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-09-07· cited 4×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McLean v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-03-23· cited 107×
• Holomshek v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-01-03· cited 47×
• Schneider v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-04-10· cited 19×
• Emery Worldwide v. UN. COMP. BD. of REV.
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-05-02· cited 19×
• Kretsch v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-06-11· cited 10×
• Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-11-24· cited 5×
• Simpson v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-01-13· cited 5×
• Kelly v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-01-22· cited 4×