New v. Anthony

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding conduct is not a serious invasion of privacy if it merely is part of a \routine commercial behavior.\
• stating that in the typical section 17200 case, a plaintiff alleges “that he made a purchase or otherwise parted with money on account of [the defendant’s] allegedly unfair practices”
• discussing requirements for an invasion of privacy claim and explaining that “[t]he tort is proven only if the plaintiff had an objectively reasonable expectation of seclusion or solitude in the place, conversation or data source” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
• elements of claims under California constitution for right to privacy and for common law tort of intrusion into private matters
• “The elements of a cause of action for 12 violation of the California Constitution’s guaranteed right to privacy are ‘(1) a legally protected 13 privacy interest; (2) a reasonable expectation of privacy in the circumstances; and (3
• “[W]e have found no case which imposes 17 liability based on the defendant obtaining unwanted access to the 18 plaintiff's private information which did not also allege that 19 the use of plaintiff's information was highly offensive.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).